Capital Suggestion
Farrukh Saleem on 20, Feb 2012 | 5 Comments | in Category: Insight
On one side is the Supreme Court’s order which is categorical, clear-cut and specific. On the other side is the party head whose near-dictatorial powers are all-encompassing both in scope as well as content. And in between the ‘devil and the deep blue sea’ is Makhdoom Syed Yousuf Raza Gilani.
Syed Yousuf Raza Gilani knows full well that a categorical, clear-cut, specific order exists. Our chief executive certainly has the ability to comply with the order. And yet Syed Yousuf Raza Gilani has failed to comply. Why? Why is PM Gilani behaving the way he is? According to Animal Behaviour Online, “When a behaviour is observed, perhaps the first question that comes to mind is ‘why’.”
To begin with, PM Gilani is facing little or no public pressure from the court of public opinion. Coalition party heads, for their own vested interests, are siding with an indicted PM. And that says a lot about our personal as well as cultural values. Personal values are about “what is good, beneficial, important, useful, beautiful and desirable.” Cultural values are “commonly held standards of what is acceptable or unacceptable, important or unimportant, right or wrong.”
Some four years ago, 77,664 voters of Multan-IV voted for Syed Yousuf Raza Gilani. Some four years ago, the PPP’s party head made the MNA from Multan-IV the prime minister of Pakistan. Now there is no pressure from the 77,664 voters and the party head, courtesy the 18th Amendment, is more powerful than ever before. What then is the most logical choice for Gilani? Whose interests do you think Gilani should be serving – his 77,664 voters’ or his party head’s?
Ethonomics is a field of inquiry that studies the ‘prioritisation of values within a particular value system’. The Inglehart-Welzel Cultural Map has grouped Pakistan, Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Angola, Tanzania, Zimbabwe and Nigeria as ‘survival communities’. Unfortunately, almost all survival communities are rated ‘very corrupt’ in the Corruption Perception Index (CPI). Voters in survival communities lack food, shelter and clothing and thus share a value system that is based on ‘survival values’. These are communities where religion is important, deference to authority is indoctrinated and rejection of divorce is prevalent with high levels of national pride and a severe lack of trust between and among citizens.
The other side of the coin represents prosperous, welfare communities where the provision of food, shelter and clothing is available to most. This group includes countries like Sweden, Norway, Denmark, New Zealand, Finland and Canada. All of these countries are rated as the ‘least corrupt’ in the CPI. Voters in this group of countries take their physical and economic survival for granted and thus share a value system that is based on ‘self-expression values’ – morality, rule of law etc.
Pakistani voters – especially rural – are primarily driven by survival values. And survival, courtesy the 18th Amendment, is now more in the hands of the party head than ever before. What then is the most logical choice for Gilani?
How valuable is it for our leaders to create a real value? No wonder a ‘fish rots from the head down’. No wonder Imran Khan is winning hearts – if not minds.
You might also like:
-
S Nasrullah
-
NASAH
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
S Nasrullah




